Fact: the city with the worst traffic in the world is whatever city you happen to be driving in. Right?
Well, without getting too far into the theory of relativity, the answer is: No. Some cities regularly have much worse traffic than others. And with public transport an unattractive alternative during the pandemic, some road commutes are taking longer than ever.
But drivers don’t get off the hook that easily. We’ve all been guilty of waiting until the last possible moment to drive to work, hitting avoidable rush hour traffic. We’ve all got stuck for hours, homeward-bound because we listened to our bellies instead of the traffic report. Dinner will have to wait, one way or another!
FleetLogging wondered whether it really makes so much difference to plan travel in and out of a city at off-peak times. We decided to find out. First, our researchers identified 141 of the most congested cities in the world. Then, we used the TravelTime API to calculate how far from each city center you could drive in one hour, both on- and off-peak. Next, our data viz boffins created a series of maps and charts to illustrate the difference in delays in each city.
We even included a comparison tool, so you can check your current city against the others in our study – and verify whether it’s true that others are even more stuck than you.
Topics
Key Findings
- Marseille is the city with the biggest discrepancy between rush hour and off-peak journeys: you could travel 22.8 miles further in an hour by waiting for off-peak.
- The US city with the biggest discrepancy is Boise, Idaho, where you can travel 14.4 miles further in one hour by waiting for off-peak periods.
- London is the most difficult city to get out of during rush hour – in an hour you’ll travel just 12.7 miles.
- Singapore has the most-clogged off-peak roads – you will make it just 16.6 miles in an off-peak hour.
No Escape: The World’s Most Congested Traffic Routes
France is celebrated for its slow culture, but one category that the French would like to speed up is the road traffic. Marseille, Lyon, and Paris experience the longest delays in the world during rush hour compared to off-peak times. In Marseille, waiting for an off-peak hour could see you travel 22.8 miles further than if you leave during peak times.
London, England, is the worst city to escape during rush hour – you’ll get just 12.7 miles from the center. However, even during off-peak times, you’d only make it to a distance of 23.3 miles. There are a few cities where the time you leave makes little difference. In Honolulu, you’ll get just a few hundred yards further in an hour if you wait for an off-peak period.
The US City That Hates To Tell Commuters “Aloha ‘Oe”
Honolulu is the American city with the slowest escape route in our study. However, your ETA won’t change much if you wait for the rush hour to pass. There’s a difference of just 0.2 miles between peak/off-peak journeys. Hardly significant when viewed next to the second smallest gap, that of Seattle, which has a disparity of 6.7 miles.
Boise is the city with the most significant rush hour effect, as mentioned above. Philadelphia has the second-biggest disparity: you’ll cover more than 50 miles during regular times, but fewer than 40 when everyone’s out. There’s an ambient pleasure, then, in watching rush hour footage of the Schuylkill Expressway during the lockdown. Finally, your gas pedal could get some love.
Glasgow Has The UK’s Most Severe Rush Hour
London may have the worst traffic in our study, but it doesn’t have the worst rush hour in relative terms. Glasgow tops the list with a 12-mile discrepancy between rush hour and regular hours. But you can still make it 41.3 miles out of Glasgow during the busy periods – nearly twice as far as you can travel from London during rush hour!
Of the UK’s 20 most populous cities, Hull is the one with the least discrepancy between rush hour and off-peak traffic: you’ll get six miles further during a quiet hour.
European Commuter Traffic: It’s All In The Timing
French traffic has long been the butt of the joke. Our study shows that three French cities have the most serious rush hour problems in Europe and the world. Recent issues such as lockdown and, before that, the public sector strikes have made matters worse.
But both Marseille and Lyon’s high discrepancies come along with relatively high (50+ miles) off-peak distances. So, the good news in each case – as for other high-discrepancy cities such as Hamburg, Lisbon, Prague, and Budapest – is that if you time your trip right, you can still cover a lot of ground in a short time.
Head-to-head: Choose Two Cities To Compare Traffic Conditions
Looking to settle an argument? Click the arrows to choose two cities from the drop-down menus. The blue area on the maps shows how far you can get during an off-peak hour, pink shows rush-hour, and the stats are underneath.
Not all capitals get it equally bad. In Berlin, Germany’s capital, you can knock 12.6 miles off your projected distance if you leave it until rush hour, while in Oslo (Norway) the discrepancy is just 6.2 miles. Considering that both capitals have an off-peak distance of 43 miles, the difference in the rush hour effect between the cities is notable.
Compare across continents and you get some surprising similarities. Washington has a rush hour distance of 39.8 miles, and you’ll get 8.7 miles further off-peak; for Bangkok, Thailand’s capital, the figures are 39.6 and 9.0 miles, respectively. A shared culture of twiddling the knob on the car radio!
London Doesn’t Want You to Go
London is the hardest city to escape in the world with motorists only being able to travel 12.7 miles during rush hour. Singapore is slightly better, coming in second place at 15.4 miles during rush hour But as you can travel at least 20 miles during rush hour in every other city in the world it demonstrates just how congested these top two cities are. In fact, London is twice as congested as the 5th hardest city to escape in the world, Monaco.
In contrast, the 19 cities from which you can drive the furthest during rush hour are all in the US. Demonstrating that the States really is the land of the free, when it comes to driving at least.
European And American Cities Suffer Worst Rush Hours
Our next visualization maps the difference between rush hour and off-peak journeys in the 10 cities with the greatest discrepancies. Europe and the United States dominate. Boise, Idaho, comes out top in the US, with a 14.4-mile difference in how far you can travel. The so-called City of Trees has been plagued by bad rush hour traffic as urban development has boomed in recent years.
European capitals make up half of the top ten cities. Paris, Monaco, Lisbon, Prague, and Budapest struggle to funnel commuter traffic at the end of the day. Paris and Monaco stand out as cities where the going is never good. You’ll get no further than 40 miles from either city center even when the traffic is relatively quiet.
How To Deal With A Long Commute
Traffic is a fact of life for those who choose to drive in and out of the city. Of course, the best thing you can do for your well-being and the environment is to cycle or take public transport if possible. But if not, it is healthy to develop techniques to deal with traffic rather than spend evening after evening shouting at your steering wheel.
Remembering to check the traffic news shortly before leaving is a good habit to form. Get used to the idea that you might need to spend an extra hour in town or at home (depending on which direction you’re going) and find ways to make use of the waiting time outside of your car instead of sitting in traffic.
If you must drive at the busiest times, or yours is one of the cities that are always clogged, develop your in-car culture: sing, try new routes, try audiobooks, or learn a thing or two about the other vehicles on the roads. You know what’s ahead of you, so don’t get caught off-guard; get philosophical. And remember, drivers – you’re not stuck in traffic, you are traffic!
METHODOLOGY & SOURCES
We used the TravelTime API to calculate the area that can be reached by car in 1 hour from the city center in both peak and off-peak hours. We collected this data for the most populous city in every state in the US, the 20 most populous cities in the UK, all European capitals, and the world’s biggest metropolitan areas covered by TravelTime.
Registered vehicles data was sourced from WHO, and populations were sourced from WorldOmeter.
The data was collected in November 2020.
Other Popular Topics:
- 11 Best Fleet & Fuel Cards For Truckers
- 20 Best Fleet & Fuel Cards Companies For Small Business
- 50 Best Telematics Companies & Fleet Solutions
- 52 Best Fleet Management Companies: Systems & Solutions
- 20 Best Commercial Truck Tracking Systems & Tracker Devices
- 53 Best GPS Fleet Tracking Systems & Companies
- 36 Best GPS Asset Tracking Companies & Tracker Devices
- 32 Best Fleet Management Software Companies
Fred van Leeuwen says
Obviously never drove in Nairobi, Mombasa, Kampala or Dar es Salaam.
Also Bangkok and Manilla seem to be quite challenging.
Arneldo P Bumatay says
Strange how LA and SF Bay Area rush hour traffic aren’t mentioned. Maybe we have it better than we think. I think not!
Marge says
See where Boise is on the list? That’s where your LA and SF traffic now reside.
Mick says
Ain’t that the truth….😤
Karen Reiter says
We should ban cars on highways-public transport only. Common sense tells us it would make everyone’s life easier, healthier, more pleasant.
Kenneth Hart says
Los Angeles makes none of your list?
Marge says
Half of California lives in Boise now.
Marge says
See where “Boise, ID” sits on that list? That’s where the previous LA commuters live now.
Derp says
What absolute twaddle. Anyone who has ever been to LA knows that it’s NOTORIOUS for its traffic. The fact that this wasn’t even MENTIONED tells me that you know your methodology is bullshit. Meanwhile I’m sure the people in Boise are quite happy that this might keep more people from moving there.
Patricia Spring says
Monaco, really? Anyone who has been there would know that you could walk out of Monaco on a coffee break.
starvinmarvin says
Any rush hour list that doesn’t include Seattle, WA traffic is fundamentally flawed.
PLdB says
Boise, Idaho? LOL I’m sure all 500 of its commuters create quite the gridlock… Obviously you all have never driven in São Paulo (population: 22 million with a terrible subway system). Or any cities in India…
James P Kutrich says
Seems like your missing a part of the equation in coming up with this list. I have lived in Seattle and now live in the Boise area. To say that Boise is the worst of the two and Seattle isn’t on the list confounds reality.
What is missing is the duration of “rush hour”. Seattle and Los Angeles are not on the list because their rush hour is almost going 24/7. Boise’s rush hour may last an hour or two at the most. Therefore one would say that putting up with a typical Boise day is preferable over cities with constant gridlock.
Also, 50 miles from downtown Boise puts in the desert going east and west. Rarely is the communter traveling half the mileage.
Teresa Jeffries Nichols says
I was raised in Gooding Idaho and move to Anaheim California when I was 19. So I grew up I’m not Orange County, LA County, and Riverside County freeways and streets. When I relocated back to Idaho 4 years ago I was astounded at the traffic and the way the signals are set. It is an absolute nightmare. Now I know how Idaho hates Californians but I am here to tell you the biggest reason our traffic is so snarled here is the way the signals are set. You sent out a signal minute after minute and tell road rage is bound to sit in. I have clocked 8 minutes to get out of my own track on to Chinden just down from lender. That’s a long long time to wait. If the transportation department would cut the time of the signals in half, traffic would flow so much better. I’ve lived and traveled in both worlds and I know what I’m talking about.
Thomas J Raffetto says
Californians go back and our traffic will get good again…
Delzompo says
You would be surprised on how bad Boise truly is. They have no, I mean No public transportation. No really throw fairs. They have 1 highway, and only 5 roads you can drive on that actually gets you somewhere besides a dead end. Boise has screwed themselves. Now they have to dig themselves out. Which I doubt since their thinking is so very far behind the times.
Mick says
I don’t think any one posting comments here actually paid attention to the dynamics being used here.. There is no discrepancy with those dynamics. It’s not saying that Boise has more traffic, it’s just stating that the distance you can travel during rush hour as opposed to non rush hour is greater than anywhere else.
California commuter says
Collecting this data in November 2020 is really skewing the results big time and is not representative of the reality (especially pre-pandemic). The data was collected at a time when so many people were working remotely and thus not even on the road commuting at all. I would be interested to see the numbers based on pre-March 2020 data because I’m sure at least one California city would be on this list. The fact that LA and Bay Area cities are missing is shocking. Also not even NY?? The infographics are cute and all, but all this article shows me is places that didn’t (or weren’t able to) allow most of their workforce to work from home during the pandemic. It would be more interesting to see how the trend has changed from pre-pandemic, to during pandemic (this study), and even after. The title and infographics should really be updated to say “Worst rush hours during the pandemic” to be more reflective of the data that was actually collected.
Richard says
Be interesting to see how far you could get in an hour using public transport